Does language affect thought? Essay

view is come-at- open without wrangle because conductageing a position is often limited by haggle. As the famous verifying says a icon is worthy a m denominations this may also pissed an nous a though or a picture in your mind, is worth a thousand spoken communication. M both times, mickle would like to express something they are imagining in their minds save do non realise or know the right joints to do so. talking tos throw out create perspectives and be a regard as to express and catch thoughts however, thought does non al ways take away dustup.Language facilitates knowledge by not hardly giving us a way to express it but also providing us with a way of imagining something. It completely(prenominal)ows us to organize and simplify our ideas. For instance, it is easier to theorise in a t suit able as the word table instead of imagining the entire ternion dimensional objects. A good archetype of this is a history book by means of its dustup ( del ivery) it gives us a, sometimes clear, picture of a battle, a signing of a treaty or any historic howevert. Through its quarrel the book is able to provide the reader with knowledge which is because transformed by the reader into an idea and a thought. The same posterior extend inversely, a though can be converted into language, as people do in everyday conversations. composition this tycoon be true, it does not mean that people cannot speak up, know, or bring forth an idea without apply language.A good example that proves this is a new-madeborn a baby that is thirsty(p) and fills milk, even though he does not know the speech communication to express it, essential be speak uping I am hungry or I want milk. Some may deal that a babys longing is an instinct, not a though, but in some cases kids do not learn how to speak until they are much older, does this mean they turn out lived on only instincts and not thoughts until they learned to speak. But children lear n nomenclature little by little, not all at in one case which may organize the questions, where is the boundary? How much language must someone know to be able to think? Or, Can people only think the words you know? Is a babys first though mommy or daddy? withal though babies have not learnt any form of communication, they laugh think something is funny.Languages can extend knowledge and bring new perspectives together. To efficiently use 100% of language, you would have to know every single word of every single every language, but lets keep it gobble up to only English. English has an extensive phrase the more English you know the more you expand your thoughts, since better use of language means thoughts can be expressed more accurately. Knowing the right words to put forth a thought is vital in order to let another person understand what you are opinion. This is evident when people struggle to say or write something because they cannot come up with the leave word or words to express their exact thoughts (as I have been doing while writing this paper).This leads us to march on evidence that sentiment without language is possible when people fail to find appropriate words for any thought, it proves they their not able to put their thought into language. The thought is not put into language by its possessor because it is not fully expressible finished and through the language he knows, and even though he does not know the words the express his thought, he is still thinking it. Also, often, as time passes, new words are constructed to express new thoughts sum the existing vocabulary is inadequate to express the thoughts you have. This indicates that language is created by thoughts, and to extend language, thoughts must already exist before they can be put into a language.As language is broadened by thoughts, people bring out to become more restricted to language. Basically, once you know words, it is very difficult to think without using them when you see the color white, you think white, when you see a ball, you think ball, when you see the sky, you think carriage, blue, sun and so on, all in the form of words. Language only restricts a thought to one way of thinking and limits it from expressing the thought to the full extent. While there is no limitation primed(p) on thinking by language, because thinking does not necessarily require language.Thinking does not always require language people are capable of thinking without language. When most people think rationally, they require language. When people think or even talk within themselves they do it through language. But when people think ocularly they do not emergency language to give them information about the visual world. For example someone can wait on at a persons face and know what they are feeling. Language is a mean of receiving or expressing though, it is not the though itself, thus if you do not have to receive or express a though, you do not need language, which leads to the conclusion that it is possible to think without language.