Melian Dialogue as interpreted through perspectives of Realism, Liberal

Melian Dialogue as interpreted through perspectives of Realdoctrine, Liberalism, and Constructivism Imagine Cleomedes, son of Lycomedes, common of the famed forces of the lustrous Athenian Empire, waiting for a trio of representatives to issuance from The Melian Dialogue. Well? he demands impatiently as they arrive, What did they say? As perspectives and opinions in the realm of political science are fluid and bound to change, he receives a variety of replies, for the representatives body he sent happen to hold sand a Realist, a Liberal and a Constructivist. The variances the philosophies and universal laws his representatives throw back at him intrigue General Cleomedes. He recognizes that within the power melt of the population, and the role of Athens as a superpower within the worlds political arena, he must be thoroughly verse in ein truth possible political perspective. Thus, he invites his representatives to share their knowledge view of what transpired between the dial ogue between the Melians and the Athenians. The Realist, absolutely dedicated to the saving and security of the Athenian Empire declares stoutly, General, it is no great surprise that our negotiations reflected the achiever and dominance of realism in the political arena. The Liberal, mindful of universal commiseration over such a nationalistic approach, gasps. Deeply moved by the proceedings of the Melian dialogue, and aghast at the lack of understanding in her laddie representatives, she offers a venomous retort, To hell with realism Cant you affect the truth? Oh, my comrades are blind to the universal laws of right and wrong Truly, our very invasion of this nation is immoral We should be moved by empathy and mercy for the Melians A steady, even voice i... ...ialogue are enveloped in the great ism constructs for which this extremely modern political theory is known (Hughes, Chp.3). And as the Constructivist sees sociable groups interacting within the world, he contributes to our understanding of the groups through the invention of identity. The Constructivists label groups of people with common interests and gives words with which to speak of rising ideas and philosophies. The Melian Dialogue bears a military of political interpretations as the Melians and Athenians negotiate the reality of power and rights of countries on the graduated table of empires. Though Cleomedes eventually relied on the heavy handed realist course of activity in the Peloponnesian War, ideally, he could have cultivated a estimable respect for differing universal truths of political theories and the fluidity of interpretation in both text available to us today.